Exploring the Differences Between HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

Published on


HTTP, or Hypertext Transfer Protocol, is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It is a protocol that allows clients and servers to communicate with each other and exchange information.

The latest versions of HTTP, HTTP/2 and HTTP/3, are designed to improve the performance, security, and reliability of web applications. Let's dive deeper into what makes these two protocols different.

What is HTTP/2?

HTTP/2 is the successor to HTTP/1.1, and it was designed to address some of the limitations of the previous version. HTTP/2 enables the server to send multiple requests in a single connection, eliminating the need for multiple TCP connections.

It also supports server push, which allows the server to send resources to the client before they are requested. This can significantly improve web performance by reducing the latency of page loading.

What is HTTP/3?

HTTP/3, on the other hand, is the newest version of HTTP, and it uses a different transport protocol called QUIC. QUIC was designed to address the limitations of TCP, which can cause delays and packet loss.

HTTP/3 is designed to improve web performance in situations where network conditions are poor or inconsistent. It achieves this by reducing the number of round trips required to establish a connection and encrypting more of the communication between client and server.

Differences between HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

One of the main differences between HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 is the transport protocol used. HTTP/2 uses TCP, while HTTP/3 uses QUIC.

Another difference is that HTTP/3 is designed to improve performance on unreliable networks, such as mobile networks. HTTP/3 reduces the number of round trips required to establish a connection and encrypts more of the communication between client and server.

Additionally, HTTP/3 supports connection migration, allowing a client to switch to a new network without dropping the connection.


HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 are both designed to improve web performance and security, but they differ in their approach.

While HTTP/2 uses TCP to improve performance, HTTP/3 uses QUIC to address the limitations of TCP. With the increasing use of mobile devices and the internet, HTTP/3 is expected to become more prevalent in the coming years.

By understanding the differences between HTTP/2 and HTTP/3, developers can choose the right protocol for their web applications and ensure optimal performance for their users.

Updates straight in your inbox!

A periodic update about my life, recent blog posts, TIL (Today I learned) related stuff, things I am building and more!

Share with others

Liked it?


You may also like

  • system-design

    Snowflake ID: Generating Unique IDs for Distributed Systems

    In modern distributed systems, generating unique IDs is crucial for data consistency and scalability. Snowflake ID is a type of unique identifier that is widely used in distributed systems for generating IDs with high precision, scalability, and availability. In this blog post, we will discuss what Snowflake ID is and how it works, and explore its use cases and benefits.

    3 min read
  • system-design

    Exploring HTTP/2 Server Push: An Efficient Way to Speed Up Your Web Applications

    HTTP/2 Server Push is an innovative feature of the HTTP/2 protocol that allows web developers to proactively push resources to clients before they even request them. This feature helps in reducing page loading time and enhancing the overall performance of web applications.

    3 min read
  • system-design

    WebSocket: Real-time Communication Made Easy

    Are you tired of relying on traditional HTTP requests for real-time communication in your web applications? Look no further than WebSocket! This powerful protocol allows for two-way communication between a client and server, enabling real-time data transfer without the need for constant requests and responses.

    2 min read